Compliance Content
Carbon Reduction Plan, Modern Slavery Statement and Privacy Policy published and current.
What a weak website costs you
Without a current, compliant website, a buyer assumes claimed policies and certifications may not actually exist, the business is not actively maintained or invested in, a gap between bid claims and public evidence, weak data protection practice and lower overall credibility across every other claim in the bid.
None of that may be true of you. It does not matter. In a tender, the assumption is what gets scored.
The website point most manufacturers miss
Most manufacturers think a website is marketing. For tender purposes it is a due diligence surface, checked without your knowledge, outside the formal evaluation process.
A stale website works against you before a human even reads your submission.
What web and digital support covers
GDPR & Data Handling
Cookie consent and data-handling disclosures that meet UK GDPR requirements.
Evidence Pages
Case studies and accreditation showcases built as citable tender evidence.
Consistency Check
Everything on the site matches exactly what's claimed in the bid.
What a tender-ready website looks like for a manufacturer
- Carbon Reduction Plan, Modern Slavery Statement and policies are live, current, and easy to find.
- Certifications shown on the site match what's actually held and in date.
- Case studies exist as citable evidence for capability questions.
- The site loads properly, has no broken pages, and looks maintained.
- Contact and company details match Companies House records exactly.
- Social value and ESG claims on the site match what's in submitted bids.
- Nothing on the site contradicts anything claimed in a bid response.
How your website affects your tender score
| Tender criterion | What this service contributes | Score effect |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | Published policies verified during due diligence | Major |
| ESG | Carbon Reduction Plan and social value content must be publicly findable | Major |
| Risk | Inconsistency between site and bid reads as a red flag | Major |
| Quality | A current, professional site signals operational maturity | Moderate |
| Experience | Case studies serve as accessible, checkable evidence | Moderate |